![]() ![]() This way you would get to know the project structureīefore diving into it and besides there's not much to customize in the Though as well as writing a few lines for generating it from theīuild.xml file. It might be easier for you to start with the DMG package That this would be the ideal option for Mac OS X.Ĭustomizing the GUI so that it fits the Mac OS X look and feel is also a I of course remember that you proposed donating dmg packages and agree There were no plans in using it as _the_ exclusive In other words izPack is to remain as the default installer for WindowsĪnd a generic replacement for operating systems that we don't haveĪnything else for. I entered the issues because we were discussing usage of izPack withĭamian and he agreed to do some tests with it. Linux until we have volunteers for supporting per distro custom packages. We're going to use izPack for installer packages for Windows and also Romain unsubscribe, e-mail: additional commands, e-mail: Romain, I can first focus on that, and we can then decide about the package stuff. Some small improvements can be done in the GUI to fit to the MAC OS look and feel: menu bar, help box in the menu bar, some tabs or growbox that may overlap with others boxes etc. In any case, the package is not the only feature that could be provided to MAC users. What is your opinion: do you prefer to have an izpack launcher for OSX or to provide an OSX package? I think the former would be easier to maintain, whereas the later is the most common way to install softwares for OSX users. There are no mentions about a MACOSX izpack launcher. I have recently seen in sc-issues that a task is assigned to create a native izpack launcher for Sip communicator (issues 105/106/107). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |